WEC Spa BoP (Updated)

A simpler correlation between performance and adjustment. A wider range of BoP parameters.

Updated 5/5/2025 (first published 22/4/2025)

Spa-Francorchamps1 is the third of the new 3 race average approach2.


Observations Previous Performance BoP changeCorrelationData


Observations

  • The correlation between the performance over the last three races and the change to the BoP (power and weight) compared to those races is much improved.
    • The high speed power and speed trap data correlation is not there like it was for Bahrain and Imola.
  • There is a wider range of powers. With the lower power limit reduced. This matches the change IMSA has made. Before it appeared they were reluctant to go under 500kW, having done so only slightly before3.
  • There are limitations to what adjustments can be made:
    • No car goes above 520kW high power limit. Toyota and Cadillac are still seen as draggy and have the highest high speed power. There appears to be a 520kW maximum that they don’t want to go over even for high speed only.
    • Another limit they seem to be bumping up against is the lower weight limit, which Peugeot is still at (1030kg). Aston Martin is moving towards that.
  • At the other end of the scale the upper range of the weight scale is being pushed, with Toyota up where it had to be when Vanwall/Glickenhaus was in the series!

Previous Three Race Performance

To come up with these the rule makers compare to the last three race. So let’s start by reminding ourselves of the order in those races.

What did the last three races look like:
Updated three race average (Bahrain, Qatar, and Imola). The races that has dropped out of the calculation is included for reference.

Combined Peak and Stint Performance

·24.6 COTA24.7 Fuji24.8 Bahrain25.1 Qatar25.2 Imola
1stToyotaCadillacToyotaFerrariFerrari
2ndAlpinePorscheFerrariBMWBMW
3rdFerrariBMWPorscheToyotaToyota
4thBMWAlpineAlpineCadillacAlpine
5thCadillacToyotaBMWPeugeotPeugeot
6thPorschePeugeotPeugeotAlpinePorsche
7thLamborghiniFerrariCadillacPorscheCadillac
8thPeugeotLamborghiniLamborghiniAston MartinAston Martin
Ferrari, now the top of the ranking is highlighted in each race. Lamborghini is no longer in the series.

The average of all those combine peak and stint performances these three rounds:

·Manufacturer24.8
Bahrain
25.1
Qatar
25.2
Imola
AverageAdjustment
Needed
1Ferrari211100.12%-43bps
2Toyota133100.22%-33 bps
3BMW522100.33%-23 bps
4Alpine464100.55%0 bps
5Porsche376100.62%+7 bps
6Cadillac747100.69%+13 bps
7Peugeot655100.73%+18 bps
8Aston MartinNA (1)88101.16%+60 bps
Lamborghini8NANANANA
Average100.55%0 bps
The fastest in each race is highlighted. Average excludes Lamborghini as it withdrew from FIA WEC. Adjustment needed just refers to the performance bump needed, but any BoP parameter. That will be decided by the model used for each car.

Aston Martin had such a relatively poor performance that it offsets Toyota’s theoretical best performances Bahrain

Speed Trap

Repeating the same exercise for Speed Trap data here is the ranking by race:

·24.6 COTA 24.7 Fuji 24.8 Bahrain25.1 Qatar 25.2 Imola
1stFerrariFerrariPeugeotBMWPeugeot
2ndAlpinePorscheToyotaFerrariFerrari
3rdLamborghiniAlpinePorschePeugeotAlpine
4thPeugeotBMWFerrariAlpineCadillac
5thBMWPeugeotAlpinePorscheBMW
6thPorscheCadillacCadillacToyotaPorsche
7thToyotaToyotaBMWAston MartinAston Martin
8thCadillacLamborghiniLamborghiniCadillacToyota
Peugeot, now the top of the ranking is highlighted in each race. Lamborghini is no longer in the series.

The average of all those speed trap ratings these three rounds:

·Manufacturer24.8
Bahrain
25.1
Qatar
25.2
Imola
AverageAdjustment
Needed
1Peugeot13199.96%-63 bps
2Aston MartinNA (1)7799.14%-12 bps
3Ferrari42299.13%-11 bps
4BMW71599.13%-11 bps
5Toyota26899.04%-2 bps
6Porsche35698.88%+14 bps
7Alpine58398.83%+19 bps
8Cadillac68498.37%+65 bps
Lamborghini8NANANANA
Average99.02%0 bps

These are very close, with the exception of Peugeot. This has a very negative high speed adjustment (and overall poor lap pace), so it is unsure what further adjustments can be made.

These will referenced against the last three races BoP position.


Latest BoP for Spa

Power:Weight

Toyota and Ferrari lose out here, with Cadillac and BMW following suit. This is perhaps a little surprising as Cadillac’s strong Fuji performance has fallen out of the development sample.

Porsche is adjusted more like BMW and Cadillac, rather than Ferrari and Toyota. That will in part be due to the penalty for its 2025 upgrade, but should this have been more considering its recent performance?

Weight

This has been achieved for Ferrari mainly by a big increase in weight. Toyota shifts up to, along with a big reduction in power, but it doesn’t lose out with the high speed power, that adjustment compensates.

Aston now has 2/3rds of the input data related to its own performance. It gets a big weight break.

Power

They have gone more IMSA-esque here and widened the range of powers they are happy to give.

High Speed Power

Toyota and Cadillac are both seen as bricks and are at the limit of what it seems the rule makers want to give these cars (520kW).

Peugeot and Alpine get a little reprieve here.

Potentially there is a nuance going on here. With a desire to narrow the gap at high speed power and with consideration of what has happened at lower speed – is that due to how long they will spend at >250 kph at Spa?


Correlation with Race Performance

Power:Weight

There is a much better correlation for Spa than we saw for Qatar and Imola. This potentially could indicate that Fuji introduced a bit of wildcard into the performance measurement.

An example of how to read these charts and expected correlations are given in an attempt to understand how that might work. A brief example is given below the footnotes on this page.

Power:Weight

It’s a good correlation. If you are above the correlation line then you have done relatively well, below not so much.

However these variations could simple be down to variations in the input performance data and nuances to each car’s BoP impact model.

Aston Martin was given best car 100% performance at Bahrain. Without that it was much further left on the scale.
Red: LMDh, Dark Blue: Hypercar, Light blue: Car without three races of data.

Weight

This correlation exists in power and weight, which this time has made it much easier to understand.

Power

High Speed Power

For the last two races the correlation between high speed performance and BoP change over the three races has been excellent. Not this time.

Another random hypothesis; maybe due to the bigger movements to power and weight there has to be some compensation here that ruins the previous simple power v. speed trap data.

The correlation is practically backwards here.
The Aston Martin is not set to 100% here, but just the straight average over its two races.


Long Term Tables/Charts

For reference here are the BoP tables for power and weight going back to the beginning of time.


  1. WEC_2025_D24_Hypercar_BOP ↩︎
  2. Here is an attempt to understand how that might work. ↩︎
  3. Ignoring Alpine’s grandfathered LMP1, obviously you pedantic so and so. ↩︎
, , ,

Comments

One response to “WEC Spa BoP (Updated)”

  1. M3racer Avatar
    M3racer

    Thank you – G

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *